As usual, I am a little late to the party. Nothing new there. But yesterday
we were doing some long slow cooking – started a pot-roast for dinner tonight –
and I thought it would be a good time to try out the famous no-knead bread that
Mark Bittman wrote about in the New York
Times last November and that everyone in the blogosphere except me has
baked innumerable times since. I have been especially tempted by the posts over at Alaska Cooks here and here.
In
retrospect, I can’t quite figure out what took me so long. Though the recipe has of course been tweaked
and fussed at as only foodies can, the gist is simple. In case you have been living in a cave and have managed not to hear about it, this is it:
- Three cups of bread flour, ¼ teaspoon yeast, and 1 ¼ teaspoons salt go into a bowl with 1 5/8 cup water.
- Stir it around with your hands until it’s mixed and sticky. Cover with plastic wrap and set it aside somewhere room temperature for 12- 18 hours.
- When it is kind of bubbly on top and makes stretchy threads when you tip the bowl, turn it out onto a floured board. Fold it over like a tri-fold letter a couple of times, then set it on a towel you have dusted with flour, corn meal or wheat bran, sprinkle more of whatever you are using on top of the dough and top with another towel. Let it sit for 2-3 hours until it doubles in size.
- Half an hour before you are ready to bake it, preheat the oven to 450 degrees and put a heavy covered pot into the oven to heat. When the dough has doubled, put it into the hot pan seam side down. [Editor's Note: Oops, mistake! I meant seam side up -- I guess the seam helps the steam escape since the dough is too damp to slash.] Bake, covered, for 30 minutes and then uncovered for 20-30 minutes. Tip the bread out of the pan and let cool before slicing and eating (hah, as if!)
And that’s it.
So
we made it and oh, my, it’s as good as bread can be. Crackly and crusty and just fantastic. And no, we couldn’t wait til it cooled and it
didn’t slice neatly and who the hell cares. It’s spectacular – better than any bakery around here could possibly
turn out, even the ones with the fancy ovens. We have two more bowls of dough rising even as I type.

Well you're not the last one at this party because I haven't made it yet, but I have been thinking about it! Sure looks good in your photo.
Posted by: Kalyn | April 08, 2007 at 03:16 PM
I've been saving this recipe for months but still haven't gotten around to making it! I'm tempted to start a batch immediately....
Posted by: Lydia | April 08, 2007 at 04:16 PM
Looks amazing. Count me in for the party of folks who haven't made this bread yet. Should be a good one. Is there any magic to the pot you use to bake it?
Posted by: Ronnie | April 08, 2007 at 05:05 PM
Kalyn, it looks even better in person because you get that heavenly fresh baked bread aroma!
Do it, Lydia. The one problem is that there is no immediate gratification here. You need to do start it now so it's ready when you want it.
Yeah, Ronnie, there is. Since you bake at high temperature, you need to have a pot whose lid can sustain it. We have a couple of Le Creuset Dutch ovens, and Jerry took off the knobs and replaced them with stainless steel. They worked really well. You can also use pyrex or cast iron.
Posted by: Christine (myplateoryours) | April 08, 2007 at 05:16 PM
Ha! I was just writing a holiday round-up and one of the things I mention is my first taste of no-knead bread as interpreted by my mom. I was always reluctant to try it as I'm a kneading snob and all, but yes, it's indeed spectacular and a definite keeper.
Posted by: Lisa (Homesick Texan) | April 08, 2007 at 11:28 PM
Isn't it something? I've made a half dozen loaves and actually think it's badly misnamed. It should be something like the Bread with the World's Best Crust from a Home Oven -- so good that you'd be HAPPY to knead if that's what it took to get it.
Nice to see the recipe netted down, I've made it often enough now I don't even use a recipe, just start tossing it together.
But. The one difficulty I have is timing, wanting it ready for supper, say. I start at 8pm the night before.
Glad it's a hit, who says that bread-making's a lost art?!!
Posted by: Alanna | April 09, 2007 at 02:37 PM
Alright, alright already, I'll make the bread! This has got to be the 800th time I've seen a reference to it, although I have to admit that your admiration of the bread carries somewhat more weight than that which I'd previously received. Tomorrow, I begin The Bread.
Posted by: Robyn M. | April 09, 2007 at 03:31 PM
That is one beautiful boule. I've baked a similar recipe with equally outstanding results but quicker turnaround time. I used Rapid Rise yeast. Up to 20 hours seems too long to wait for good bread. :)
Posted by: Susan | April 10, 2007 at 08:45 AM
I've said it before, Lisa, your mom sounds like a cool lady.
And I am with you, Alanna. This bread gets a bad rap -- it's not just that it's a short-cut, it is actually better than any bread I have baked the traditional way.
Trouble with tomorrow, Robyn, is that you want it yesterday. The time lag is a problem.
How much shorter can you cut the rise, Susan? Twenty hours is a bit of a wait, though worth it.
Posted by: Christine (myplateoryours) | April 10, 2007 at 08:59 AM
Okay, I'm with Robyn. I'll cry "uncle" and make this recipe!
I'm secretly hoping that I hate it. Otherwise, I see myself eating a loaf of bread with every meal. I'm getting ready for vacation in a few weeks and I don't want to have to use a wide-angle lens to capture a photo of me on the beach.
Posted by: Kevin | April 10, 2007 at 12:50 PM
You can cut the wait by about half, but I know old school purists will challenge it. Rapid Rise (one of a few different brands) is just a more robust, viable yeast strain. According to the Cook's Illustrated crowd, it performs well and produces virtually identical results.
Posted by: Susan | April 10, 2007 at 06:22 PM
I guess I'm still on my way to the party. Maybe I'm old school, but I just love kneading dough--it's so relaxing. I am interesting in trying the no-knead type, and you've just piqued my curiosity even more. It looks delicious!
Posted by: Susan from Food "Blogga" | April 11, 2007 at 01:50 PM
It's all your fault. Now I'm obsessed with making this bread. Can't stop. I now have 4 loaves going for tomorrow, and have already made 3.
Posted by: Krissy | April 13, 2007 at 05:25 PM